More than one person has told me that I "must" write a book with triathlon in it, since I know it so well and because it is so interesting. For some reason, I have never had even the slightest twinge of an urge to do this. The closest thing is the beginning of a manuscript about a swimmer, maybe because I was a swimmer in high school and triathlon is entirely part of my adult life. Also, as a teenager I was so convinced I was not athletic that there is still a part of me that feels like my success in triathlon is a dream.
But then I read a very interesting letter to the editor in Runner's World Magazine. It was from a woman whose husband had been in a bad car accident. His leg had been crushed and they had saved it, but he couldn't run on it anymore. He'd tried and tried and it just had been damaged beyond that use. So, after reading an article on Oscar Pistorius and his success running with prosthetics (he sued to be allowed to go to the Olympics, and won!), the man decided to have his leg amputated. His wife was so happy, I guess because he wouldn't be in pain anymore.
There had to be a story in there somewhere, I thought. There had been this article on how unfair it was for Pistorius to be in the Olympics, supposedly because prosthetics were so much more "efficient" than real legs. (To which I say, uh--so why is it that no one with prosthetics has ever actually competed in the Olympics?) Then Runner's World sort of apologized and explained that one thing the article on efficiency had left out was the whole issue of pain, and how much pain management an athlete had to have to run on prosthetics.
What if there was no pain? What if in the future prosthetics are what people want? What if people voluntarily get their legs amputated so they can be faster and better athletes? Thus began a short story about the doctor who is asked to amputate a perfectly healthy leg on a boy who just wants to compete with the other kids with prosthetics. And what does he do with the leg afterward?
But then I read a very interesting letter to the editor in Runner's World Magazine. It was from a woman whose husband had been in a bad car accident. His leg had been crushed and they had saved it, but he couldn't run on it anymore. He'd tried and tried and it just had been damaged beyond that use. So, after reading an article on Oscar Pistorius and his success running with prosthetics (he sued to be allowed to go to the Olympics, and won!), the man decided to have his leg amputated. His wife was so happy, I guess because he wouldn't be in pain anymore.
There had to be a story in there somewhere, I thought. There had been this article on how unfair it was for Pistorius to be in the Olympics, supposedly because prosthetics were so much more "efficient" than real legs. (To which I say, uh--so why is it that no one with prosthetics has ever actually competed in the Olympics?) Then Runner's World sort of apologized and explained that one thing the article on efficiency had left out was the whole issue of pain, and how much pain management an athlete had to have to run on prosthetics.
What if there was no pain? What if in the future prosthetics are what people want? What if people voluntarily get their legs amputated so they can be faster and better athletes? Thus began a short story about the doctor who is asked to amputate a perfectly healthy leg on a boy who just wants to compete with the other kids with prosthetics. And what does he do with the leg afterward?
1 comment | Leave a comment
