You are viewing metteharrison

17 June 2013 @ 10:43 pm
As promised, here are this week's links.

General links:
From UpWorthy.com, an MIT Professor talks about the need for privacy and what the future of social media holds for her daughter. And Cambridge University students display their views about the need for feminism. Meanwhile Australia's army chief demonstrates how you address sex abuse. (Watch. It's brilliant.) Ohio Republicans Introduce One of the Nation's All-Time Worst Abortion Bills. (Texas and Ohio are the worst two, actually.) MIT professor, Fiona Murray, discusses the challenges of female entrepreneurship. What does 'women's leadership mean? The Daily Feminist Cheat Sheet from Feministing.com. PA city tells domestic violence victims to Shut Up or Get Out. That is one of the worst policies regarding domestic violence I've ever heard about. Woman Sexually Assaulted in Nevada Courtroom. Pussy Riot: A Punk Prayer Documentary Examines Behind the Scenes Chaos. Why You Shouldn't Tell That Random Girl On The Street That She's Hot. in case you're feeling smug about sexism being a generational issue--that is, the ideals of the old men who are dying off, have a look at this. Yeah. Not so much an age thing. Ireland finally admits state collusion in Magdalene Laundry system. And then they came for the trans people. The things going on in Greece are terrifying.

And now for the literary/publishing/SF/gaming edition:
Author Amal El-Mohtar calls for the expulsion of Theodore Beale from SFWA. Beale has used the SFWA Twitterfeed as a platform to abuse author N.K. Jemisin because he objected to Jemisin's GOH speech. I don't even know what to say. All the links at the bottom of Amal's post say it better than I can. Carrie Cuinn, Jim Hines, Tobias Buckell among others have all addressed it.

What use is the answer when the question was wrong? This is a great article about female characters in speculative fiction and addressing the editing of women from history.

25 Things to Know About Sexism & Misogyny in Writing and Publishing by Chuck Wendig.

And... the all female reboot of X-Men issue #1 tops 177,000 copies sold. Yeah. It beat everything else.

Just when I didn't think Helen Mirren could be any cooler: Helen Mirren says Next Doctor Who Should be a Woman.

And now for a few gaming-related links: Twitter vs Female Protagonists in Video Games, Super Mario 3D -- now with a playable Princess Peach, and Why does the games industry have such a problem with female protagonists?
 
 
17 June 2013 @ 09:33 pm

Almost the first thing that I did when I got home on Saturday was to pick up the garbage off of the kitchen counter. The kids had been living on packaged foods and they tended to drop those packages wherever. They are much more focused on the food than on proper disposal. Without intending to clean up the kitchen, I did, because in the spaces between fixing myself a snack my hands moved dishes to the sink and trash to the garbage can. That was only the beginning. For the past two days I have moved through my house clearing away clutter. I finally have the time to notice it and space in my brain to realize that this item actually belongs over there. Then I put it where it goes. In some ways it is like geological research, the study of how long life has been too busy by examining the collections. I hope I can continue this calm approach to clearing away the clutter for at least a week. That will do much to improve life around here.

This morning I got up early and set to work. I knew I needed to keep myself on track, so I decided to record my work day. Perhaps in some future year this will be an interesting record, a snapshot of my work life now.

7:30 am on Monday. This is the day when I return things back to normal. I begin by mailing all the packages and answering all the email.

8:45 am, answered all the emails and printed all the invoices. Up next: assemble all the packages. (Already behind my hoped for schedule.)

9:15 Postage printed. Next I assemble packages, but I probably ought to pause for breakfast before it has to be lunch instead.

Breakfast consumed. 22 packages set out for the postman. 10:32 am, time to make the kids get out of bed and do their chores.

11:30 most of family room cleaned up and vacuumed. Still need to sort through the mess on the game table, the mess on the fireplace, the mess on the video cabinet, and at some point in the future I need to completely re-sort the game closets. There are things in there that need to be evicted.

12:00 pause for lunch and noodling.

1:00 back to work. Part of my work process has been clearing and organizing odd corners of the house where things have accumulated. It seems like during coin shipping we were always asking Where is a sharpie? Where is a box cutter? Well I found them all. Now my pencil drawer overfloweth. Sometimes I don’t realize how crazy life has been until I start cleaning up and finding the oddest things accumulated in corners.

1:20 Accounting. Ready set go.

Sorted and found some financial documents hiding in the piles on my desk. Nothing overdue, just things to record. I have reached the bottom of the sedimentary layers and exposed desk surface. On one hand I feel bad that I lost track of some things. On the other hand I feel good that my system did not permanently lose them. They just waited until I had time to attend.

2:20 Still accounting. Moving into personal accounts.

Running laundry in parallel to accounting is theoretically efficient, but sometimes it just gives me points where I lose focus and can get distracted.

2:50 Pause for a snack.

3:30 back to accounting. Still having to do extra work because of the data loss post-hard-drive crash. The one accounting session that was lost happened to be one where I reconciled the checking account, so I had to do that over again.

5:39 pm done with the accounting. It does not usually take this long. I had to pause for kid stuff multiple times and there was extra post-shipping accumulation and accounting clean up. Time to go make dinner for kids. And me. I should get to eat dinner too.

8 pm The next hour is for writing. Kind of amazing that I can spare an hour for it.

8:50 pm I can hear quarreling downstairs. Time to go enforce bedtime.

Comments are open on the original post at onecobble.com.

 
 
17 June 2013 @ 01:55 pm

So, yesterday I went to a wedding and saw the single most offensive display of religious engrained misogyny I've had the misfortune to witness since... oh... when my long ago best friend married a controlling, manipulative, abusive idiot straight out of high school. I wish I could say it was because the Christian preacher was old. He wasn't. He was thirty or thirty-five. Tops. He should've known better. In fact, his mother should've raised him better--if he had one, and I'm beginning to doubt that he did. [grits teeth in a nasty smile] I know, wedding ceremonies are pretty much infamous in the misogyny department. Enough so, that I often wonder why women work so hard on them. It's all rather ironic that the entire thing is put together by women and then a man presides over it and promptly informs all the women in question that they're chattel. And we all have to smile and nod.[1] There's something extremely messed up about that. Seriously.[2]

It all started with the word "submission." See, ladies with your lady parts messing up your thinking, it's not really a negative word. You're confused. It's a magical word filled with sparkly, shiny unicorns and fairy dust and maybe, if you're really good, furs and diamonds! Really. So, don't think. You're not very good at it anyway. That's for the man to do. It's all manly. He gets all the rights. Makes all the decisions and gets all the credit for your work. You just do what he says like a good little lady. Be pretty. Keep that pretty little mouth closed until you're told to open it. Oh, and by the way, let me remind you how your job is all about being young and pretty. And when you aren't young and pretty any more, you have no use. And your husband is perfectly right in ditching you like a used tissue. Just like the bride's mother, who won't be discussed. Or named once in this entire ceremony--let alone after it. Or told once that she did a lovely job raising her daughter all on her own while Billy Joe Bob was off playing his little boy games[3], or drinking, or lying, or sleeping with other women, or being supported by his wife because he quit his job because it was beneath him and he was bored. Nope. HE gets all the credit. You see, women exist to be decorative drudges. Isn't this fun? And the bride has spent her whole life planning and dreaming for this day! Her whole life picking out this specific dress! And now her day is done! She might as well be the princess sacrificed on top of a pyramid. Because, baby, her life is now over. Shut down that brain, honey. It's time for your man to take your life. Okay. Let's talk about how men are all powerful for a sentence or two. Annnnd... now let's get back to that "submission" word again because judging by the glares I'm getting from the audience, I'm not entirely sure all the ladies out there turned their minds off at the beginning of this ride as instructed... Oh, and let me introduce you to Mrs. Joseph Van H! Wheee! She no longer even has a first name of her own!!! It's magic! Yay!!! My nephew had to ask me what was up with the name thing. (I'm proud of him for noticing.) And then my sister's very EX husband, who hasn't set foot in a church for the entire length of the bride's life, then stood up in front of everyone to say how JESUS had blessed him, and how his little girl was now all grown up and becoming a laundry drudge like all good women do. [bangs head on keyboard] We left early. So, I wouldn't chew my tongue in half, or punch the preacher in the face. Best part? When my Aunt Jackie called my sister's Ex "Billy Joe Bob" really loud for everyone to hear.[4]

I'll post my feminist links later. I'm still recovering from staying up all night with my mom while working on arranging wedding flowers and then staying up all night Saturday because of the rage. And then... family stuff. I honestly haven't had any sleep all weekend.

------------------------

[1] Or, in my case, clutch my husband's knee to the point of bruising in order to prevent a bout of swearing.

[2] Women really need to give that some thought.

[3] Every year he signed up for *every* sport he could. Softball, soccer, golf, basketball, pool, bowling--I'm not making it up. He spent more time with other men, playing games than he ever did at home.

[4] It's um... not his name. It's what my family calls him. [cough] And my side of the bride's family is the embarrassment. [rolls eyes]

 
 
17 June 2013 @ 11:20 am

Today in yoga class we were focusing on balance poses. One of the wonderful and challenging things about balance poses is that, when you’re focused on keeping your balance, you’re forced into the moment–forced to be fully present in the pose and in your life.

While in one of those poses, our yoga teacher said something very simple yet very useful: “Look up.”

I hadn’t realized I was looking down, but I very much was, instinctively following the bending of my body as I folded forward on one foot to get into the pose.

Both the pose and staying in the pose got easier, when I did that one thing: looked up.

I remember how when my very first short story sold, I discovered there were two ways I could respond, when someone asked, “what do you write?” The first involved looking down and saying, in a sort of mumble/apology, “Oh, it’s just one story, and it’s only in a shared world anthology anyway …”

Those conversations were pretty awkward. Both I and the person I was speaking to would try to get out of them as quickly as possible. And I realized there was another way I could answer.

I could look up. Meet the other person’s eyes. Speak without apology–and with honest pride–as I said, “I’m a new writer, and my first story just appeared in an anthology.” If I had the book with me I’d hold it up. With or without the book, I would definitely smile. And the other person would generally smile too, and congratulate me, and there’d be nothing awkward about it at all.

When we look down, my yoga teacher said today, we draw our energy down with us, which can make some poses harder.

I’ve learned and relearned this throughout my writing life, and throughout the rest of my life too. It’s remarkably easy to forget. Even when you remember, sometimes it’s harder than it sounds.

But things go better if you just look up.

Mirrored from Janni Lee Simner / Desert Dispatches.

 
 
17 June 2013 @ 09:43 am
Writer and lipizzan horse-wrangler Judith Tarr has been coming out with interesting stuff this past couple weeks.

First there was the League of Shattered Authors, which opened up discussions all over the net, and here is an unflinching look at the personal fallout.

But there are good times, too, as this interview makes clear.

What makes a writer write? I wonder sometimes if the urge to commit communication to paper is inborn. When I come across diaries by people who had no claim to fame--and knew they had no claim to fame--unpublished during the writers' lifetime, like the almost unremittingly grim diaries of Miss Weeton, a governess for a large part of her life, it convinces me that some people just have to.

Fiction writing is another remove from committing one's life to paper; many think it entirely frivolous, and it certainly belongs to those in comfortable enough circumstances to be able to do it, yet story is so tightly bound into the human condition. So many motivations for doing it, especially over the long haul, as janni has been exploring of late.
 
 
Originally posted by calimac at The Greatest 20th Century Symphonists You've Never Heard Of. Post 5: Malcolm Arnold
Post 1: Kurt Atterberg
Post 2: Cornelis Dopper
Post 3: Joly Braga Santos
Post 4: Alan Hovhaness

The next name on this list is known, if he's remembered at all, primarily as a film composer. But he was also a fine if somewhat challenging symphonist, and many other things as well. I've mentioned him already in this series, so it's time for him to take center stage. Let me introduce you to:

Malcolm Arnold (1921-2006).
Tags:
 
 
for Cynsations

I'm fresh off of my first experience with Google+ Hangouts and sharing lessons learned in hopes they'll help you connect authors to readers!

Google+ offers its own video with instructions for the basics, so I'm going to focus on insights with regard to navigating a G+ Hangout to best effect.

Bookmark this post--what I'm saying will make more sense once you've checked out the system.

Tips to Keep in Mind:

  • Invite participants early -- you'll want to schedule not only the G+ Hangout but at least two practice sessions.

  • Take practices seriously and brace for changes/improvements in the system between each.

  • Write a script in advance, complete with a welcome, speaker introductions, questions, response order and closing remarks.

  • You don't have to follow the script word-per-word, but it should work for prompts.

  • In our G+ Hangout, each author-speaker had the opportunity to submit the question of her choice.

  • The speaker I.D. bar option--complete with image--is helpful, polished-looking, and a way to feature current cover art.

  • The speaker I.D. bar option could be more user friendly. Once you've created an I.D. bar that you like, try to save it. But don't count on it being saved. You may have to recreate it for the final G+ Hangout. Leave time to do so.

  • Don't get impatient. We're all expected to field a number of social networks, and many of them vary just enough to throw someone off or work in a way that's counter-intuitive. Note: Last minute conflicts and tech snags do happen.

  • Check out these additional tips for looking your best (or at least human) on-screen.

  • Use a real computer (not just anything that will access the Web).

  • Log on an hour in advance to work out any last minute glitches. Yes, an hour.

  • The screen-share option is great for highlighting a website, but it can be tricky to use. The G+ Hangout screen momentarily shuffles away and you'll have to uncover and click it again. Note: rather than showing your website (or book covers posted online), you could hold up a copy of your book(s) and other show-and-tell items.

  • Use the "mute" option on the microphone while other speakers are talking.

  • Caution: Any talking over one another (or miscellaneous other noise--doorbells, ringing phones, barking dogs) will jumble the audio.

  • Stay as still as possible. Any unnecessary movement can freeze up the screen.

  • Take advantage of the opportunity to share the G+ Hangout afterward via video. Not everyone who's interested may be able to make the live chat.

  • Promote the video through your blog, website, other social networks and list servs.

The multi-author panel format is be a first-rate (and budget-friendly) option for schools and public libraries as a way to provide insights and inspiration to teen readers. Our G+ Hangout clocked in at a little over half an hour, which is longer than most online videos, but fits nicely into a YA program.

I also can readily imagine a scenario in which one author is featured at a G+ Hangout with up to four participating school audiences.

Comparing to Skype, the main benefit of G+ Hangouts is that they seem less likely to time out. G+ Hangouts are dependent on your Internet connection (and that of all other participants), but less vulnerable to connection issues coming from the system itself.

Looking for an example?

The video below, "Other Times, Other Worlds in YA Lit, features authors Cynthia Leitich Smith (Feral Nights)(AKA me), P. J. Hoover (Solstice), Janet Fox (Sirens), Joy Preble (The Sweet Dead Life), and Candlewick Press editor and fellow YA author Deborah Noyes (Plague in the Mirror).

It's derived from a Google+ Hangout On Air that took place last Thursday. We engaged in a dynamic discussion, exploring the challenges and joys of world-building, in creating romantic elements, in writing gender roles and the parallel between fantasy and historical writing.

You'll see the video isn't perfect. G+ Hangouts don't (yet) allow for an organic flow of conversation. We struggled a bit with the system, using the microphone and transitions.

But the flow improved over time, the content is excellent and the video offers a realistic look at the opportunities in play. So check it out to learn more about these topics and to view an example of how Google+ Hangouts can connect authors to readers.

 
 

YA fantasy writer and nationally ranked triathlete Mette Ivie Harrison is known for her original fairy tales and her fairy tale retellings. She continues the Writing for the Long Haul series by asking a question many of us visit and revisit throughout our careers: what exactly is success?


When I sold my first YA fantasy, Mira, Mirror, in 2003, I remember imagining my future career. I wanted to be a New York Times Best Selling Author. I wanted to have movies made of my books. I wanted to be a “name,” an author so well-known that the people I sat down next to in the airplane recognized me and people stopped asking if they would know anything I had written. I wanted my parents and my in-laws to brag about me and my kids to tell their teachers that I was an author. I wanted to be a coveted speaker and on regular tour circuit to bookstores and schools and libraries.

Well, none of that has happened in the ten years since, and I suppose it’s possible that the person I was ten years ago would think that the career I have now is a far cry from success. But when I think back to this imagined career, I laugh a little at myself. It’s not what I want now at all. I do not mean to say that those who have had these kinds of successes should be embarrassed. Of course, they can be proud of what they have achieved. I am proud of other authors I have watched find success. But it’s just that I suspect those things are not all they are cracked up to be. And for me personally, being famous would not at all fit my personality.

In the last ten years, there have certainly been some wonderful moments on top of the world because of great reviews. I have looked forward with anticipation to great sales figures when a book was chosen by a publisher and national bookstore chain to have an in-store display. But in the end, I have come to the conclusion that Julia Roberts was right in Notting Hill when she told Hugh Grant, “nonsense it all is.” From behind the scenes, hype over a book is often exaggerated. And even if it isn’t, even if it’s the best book in the history of books, a successful book sale isn’t everything. It doesn’t change your life in the way that you might hope. It doesn’t make you happy in every way. It may not even make you happier than you were before.

I’ve seen enough authors who have had sudden, unexpected success and discovered that they did not have fewer problems than before—they just had different ones. And being jealous of other authors—something I fight on a regular basis—is really foolish. At a race recently, I passed a guy on the run who had started the race about twenty minutes before me. “Wow, you’re blazing fast,” he said, “to catch up to me. Congrats.” I know that the race mentality makes us imagine that we are competing against each other, and we sometimes think this is true for authors, as well. We think that an author who just released a debut to massive sales is “beating” authors who haven’t had the same success. But it isn’t true.

mettehound“We’re all in our own race,” I said to this guy, and I meant it. I began to have a lot more success as an athlete when I stopped measuring myself against the other people who showed up at the race I was at. I couldn’t control how many faster athletes were there, and therefore I couldn’t control my placement overall. But what I could control was my own race. I could control how well I trained, how well I ate, and how much I rested the week before a race. When my only focus was trying to do better this year than the year before, even if by only seconds, I “won” most races, since in my mind I was competing only against myself.

Of course, I don’t have absolute control even over my own body. I might get sick the night before a race, or be sick during what was supposed to be my peak week of training. That affects my results. And during the race, things happen, too. Sometimes I would end up with a flat tire on my bike, which would slow me down. On occasion, I have even crashed in a race. I can do my best to make sure I have the equipment to fix a flat with me, and I can try to keep safe on the bike, but I can’t prevent all problems. But when they happen, I get to choose how I respond to them. I also choose to be proud of myself for continuing to race even when there’s no hope of doing anything more than finishing.

In the writing world, I feel like there is something similar to this mindset. Authors don’t control book covers most of the time. We may give feedback to the publisher, which may or may not (usually not) be listened to. Authors don’t control where their editor works. Sometimes editors move. Sometimes they are let go. An orphaned book is often a terrible thing for an author, but we don’t control this. We can make the best of it, but it’s like a bike crash: grim prospects for this race/this book. Authors don’t control the marketing budget for a book. We don’t control if the book buyer for a particular large national chain likes our book. We don’t control when other authors’ books come out for the year and how those compare to ours.

But as writers, we can all set our own goals. We can measure ourselves against our own goals, our own previous books. And I think this is far more valuable (and more sane-making) than using other, arbitrary and supposedly more objective ways to find success. Sure, you can use sales numbers or movie deals or number of twitter mentions or starred reviews to decide if your book is good, if you have “won” your race. But as soon as you do that, you are giving up power over your own career to other people. You may imagine that you can control such things as the weather on race day, but this is just your imagination. It may work better for you if you accept that some races, you’re going to have rain, and that it’s possible to enjoy racing in the rain every once in a while. I have certainly faced some rain in my writing races the last ten years.

After agonizing over the sales of a book that went nowhere and received the nastiest reviews I have ever seen (Tris and Izzie), having a major contract canceled, and feeling for a couple of years as if my career as a writer was over and I wasn’t ready for it, I have come to see that my career is under my control and that I have actually had a lot of the kinds of success that matter to me. I have been racing as a writer against myself, giving myself new challenges each year, and finding ways to be proud of myself even when I’ve had a crash.

While I look back at my early paint-by-numbers view of success with a rueful humor, I can’t say that I’m unhappy that my career has taken the twists and turns that it has. I’ve learned a lot along the way, about myself and about what writing means to me, and about what other people control. And what they don’t control is my writing. Despite all of the bad times, I have woken up every day and sat down to write. I have always had a new book in mind, and usually three or four books that I needed to write. I consider that an enormous success, that I’ve kept the faith in myself and that I have continued to want to be a writer.

I still sometimes fear that my career as a writer of YA fantasy may at any moment be over and that I may have to change my name or reinvent myself completely. Yeah. So what? If I can’t run anymore, I can swim and bike. If I can’t swim, I can run. There will always be a challenge ahead of me, and I have found an enormous confidence in myself that I can face those challenges, whatever they are. I guess that once you’ve dealt with what used to be your worst nightmare, the other nightmares pale in comparison. I’ve lived through bike crashes and they scare me less than they used to. I’ve lived with crippling IT band issues, with a stress fracture in my foot, with disappointment and disaster. And I survived. I’m a survivor, and maybe that’s the most important definition of my life as a writer.

I still care enough about sales in a vague, distant way that I court them in an effort to maintain my ability to keep getting contracts so that I continue to sell books. But I also like the place that I am in now, after the rain has stopped falling. Maybe this is the eye of the storm, but I like the fact that no one is telling me what I should write next, or how to follow up a certain book’s success. I love the freedom and time that I have now to write books that appeal to me for quirky reasons that may make no sense to anyone else. I like that I can experiment beyond the genre that I first had success in.

I want to break genre rules and conventions. I want people to throw down my books and complain that I didn’t give them what they wanted. And I want other people to think for hours after they put my book down about the ideas that linger. I suppose there may still be some part of me that imagines that someday in the far-off future, my books will receive their final due. But that isn’t the time I live in. I live in now, and ultimately, my satisfaction in writing comes only from myself. I am in my own race here, too. That may sound narcissistic, but it is also very simple. It means that my satisfaction can’t be taken away by reviews or bad sales or missed expectations.

The illustrator Charles Vess once told me that he had spent a lot of his career telling himself that “this” (whatever project he was currently working on) was “the next big thing.” And after a lot of “next big things,” he looked back and saw that none of them had been the next big thing. That has been mostly my experience, as well, but I have found a kind of satisfaction there. I am pretty sure that even if I had met all the goals I had set out for myself 10 years ago, I would still have had to deal with the same self-doubts that I dealt with without that success. And they might well have been more exaggerated and more difficult to sort through, on the stage of public scrutiny. I don’t regret working them out as I have, and I don’t regret the books that are mine.

metteironmomI also do not regret that I have spent the last ten years largely at home with my five children and my husband as they moved from spanning ages one to nine, to spanning ages eleven to nineteen. I have had a real life that has not been particularly hectic. I have been able to drive my kids on errands, not worry about deadlines, enjoy a career as a competitive triathlete, eat good food that I make myself, and generally have a series of adventures that I suspect that a certain kind of success might have stolen from me. My oldest daughter attends MIT. My second daughter will be enrolling in Berklee School of Music in the fall and last year, I dragged three of my middle kids to do a relay in a half Ironman, for which I have a photo that they all beg me not to show. I don’t think these are “compensations” for the successful author life I have missed. I think that in reality, I chose this life, possibly unconsciously, as I made one choice here and once choice there. I have success, and it is my own.


metteMette Ivie Harrison’s latest novel, The Rose Throne, is about two princesses who can’t afford to follow their hearts–They have to choose to take power or to be destroyed. Her first non-fiction book, Ironmom, will be published this summer and is part memoir, part how-to manual on her triathalon experiences from rank beginner to a national ranking. Her other books include The Princess and the Hound and its five sequels/companion books and Tris and Izzie, is a retelling of Tristan and Isolde.

Find her online on tumblr, twitter, facebook, and livejournal.


Previous Writing for the Long Haul Posts:

- Jeffrey J. Mariotte on why we write
- Judith Tarr on reinventing ourselves
- Kathi Appelt on the power of story
- Cynthia Leitich Smith on balancing the business and the creative

About the Writing for the Long Haul series

Mirrored from Janni Lee Simner / Desert Dispatches.

 
 
16 June 2013 @ 07:28 pm

For Father’s Day, we went out to see Man of Steel. I had been seeing mixed reactions over this one, and been (willingly) spoiled for one of the things that happens at the end, so my expectations weren’t tremendous. Memories of Superman Returns probably helped keep my hopes from getting overly high. But going in with that mindset, I mostly enjoyed the movie. I liked Amy Adams as Lois Lane a lot, and thought Henry Cavill made a pretty good Superman. Laurence Fishburne was sadly wasted in his role as Perry White. I liked a lot of what Russell Crowe did as Jor-El, though.

I think Christopher Reeve will always be my Superman, just like David Tennant will always be my Doctor. Reeve brought a bit more fun and heart, and a less angst. But unlike Superman Returned, which tried and failed to duplicate what had been done before, Man of Steel tried to do something new, and I give them points for that.

Storywise, the last thing I’ll say before moving into spoiler territory is when they do Man of Steel II, I’d like More Character Development and Less Destroying ALL THE THINGS, please.

Spoiler time…

Read the rest of this entry »Collapse )

Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.

Tags:
 
 
16 June 2013 @ 08:50 am
Happy Father's Day, and Happy Bloomsday!

The latter celebrates James Joyce who, though never a mega-bestseller, continues to intrigue and bedazzle and madden readers a century after he wrote.

So I thought, why not celebrate the unusual novels? I'll mention a few here, and I hope others will shout some out.

Faun, by Trebor Healey, is a magical realism book from Lethe Press about a boy growing up in the Mexican community of Los Angeles who gradually turns into a Faun. Otherness, lust, faith, healing, what is natural and unnatural are all explored with a great deal of fun, sometimes raunchy, and sometimes transcendent.

I don't actually know how unusual Bed-Bugged, by Susan J. Kroupa is in the world of mysteries, as I don't read many mysteries, but it was unusual to me in that this was a cozy (really, an adorable) mystery written by a dog. It's something a smart young teen could read and enjoy, as Doodle, a cross-bred dog between labrador and poodle, is one step away from the final walk if he goes back to the pound. He's been trained to sniff out bed bugs, and his new owners are a dad ("the boss") and a girl named Molly, who has been picked for a special science school. Molly constantly carries her camera everywhere, documenting every moment of her life that she can. It is a secret project, in hopes she ever meets up with her mother, who ran off years ago. When Molly's room is broken into, and her camera and computer are stolen, Doodle gives chase, then later sniffs a familiar scent which gets him into trouble the same day Molly catches sight of a familiar face . . . Dog lovers, this is not a "the dog dies!" novel, as it is narrated by the dog in question! In fact, it looks like it is shaping up to be a series.

Adam Campan's James Fairfax is adapted from Jane Austen's Emma, with some gender play, built around a twist of history that assumes no French Revolution (of which in Austen's books there is no sign) and believable actions by Queen Christina of Sweden and the Comte d'Artois. It starts off very close to Austen's text, only with certain genders switched, which causes some unexpectedly funny twists in the whole Harriet Smith/ Mr. Elton misunderstanding, but as it goes on, there is new material added, giving an interesting take on Mr. Elton's character.

How about you?